Bobby Berosini, Ltd. v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that NRS 18.010 does not entitle a party to attorney fees on appeal because the statute \does not explicitly authorize attorney's fees on appeal\
• holding that a district court's determination under NRS 18.010(2)(b) \will not be disturbed absent a manifest abuse of discretion\
• noting that Allianz defined a claim as \groundless\ if \the allegations in the complaint ... are not supported by any credible evidence at trial\
• providing that a district court's award of attorney fees and costs is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
• holding that a party was not entitled to appellate attorney fees under NRS 18.010 because the statute was silent on the issue, and that it was not entitled to them under NRAP 38 because the appeal was not brought in a frivolous manner
• reversing an award of costs and attorneys’ fees for failure to provide sufficient itemization

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).