Bradley v. Romeo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \[t]he ability of this court to consider relevant issues sua sponte in order to prevent plain error is well established\
• holding that “antecedent debt flowing 3 to a third party” is sufficient consideration to establish liability on a promissory note
• concluding that this court may consider relevant issues sua sponte in order to prevent plain error, such as when a clearly controlling statute is not applied by the district court
• concluding that this court may consider relevant issues sua sponte in order to prevent plain error, such as when a clearly controlling statute is not applied by the district court
• noting that this court can consider relevant issues sua sponte to prevent plain error
• recognizing the appellate court's inherent ability to consider relevant issues to prevent plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).