Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 8/4/2017

Aguiar v. Drug Enforcement Administration

Citations

  • 865 F.3d 730
  • 2017 WL 3318758
  • 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14344

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, if “files consist[] of physical documents,” a search in which “each” document is “examined manually” is adequate
  • noting that if an agency conducted an adequate search it “can say so in a new declaration”
  • observing that FOIA applies only to documents that “an agency both (1) creates or obtains, and (2) controls at the time the FOIA request was made” (cleaned up)
  • affidavit identifying agency offices “tasked with conducting a search” of specific files but not explaining “how [the offices] searched within those files” insufficient to support summary judgment
  • courts can grant summary judgment based on agency declarations “if they are not called into question by . . . evidence of agency bad faith”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Rogers, Millett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Aguiar v. Drug Enforcement Administration

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.