Burke v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Principles of constitutional avoidance counsel us to first address whether a statutory ground resolves the case, and thereby renders unnecessary the need to answer the ‘constitutional question[.]’”
• “A law does not actually deter travel merely because it makes it somewhat less attractive for a person to travel interstate or it is not the most convenient form of travel.” (internal citations omitted)
• “To withstand a motion to dismiss, a complaint must allege a claim that is plausible on its face when accepting all the factual allegations as true and drawing every reasonable inference in favor of the nonmoving party.”
• “To withstand a motion to dismiss, a complaint must allege a claim that is plausible on its face when accepting all the factual allegations as true and drawing every reasonable inference in favor of the nonmoving party.”
• assessing constitutional right to travel under dormant Commerce Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).