Matthew G. Yeager v. Drug Enforcement Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the number of records requested appears to be irrelevant to the determination whether they have been ‘reasonably described’”
• “Agencies are not . . . required to commit to paper information that does not exist in some form as an agency ‘record.’”
• “[T]he number 18 of records requested appears to be irrelevant to the determination whether they 19 have been ‘reasonably described.’”
• “It is clear in this case that 14 the DEA knew ‘precisely’ which of its records had been requested and the nature 15 of the information sought from those records.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).