Aron Dibacco v. United States Army

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that an agency “need not knock down every search design advanced by every requester”
• holding that the director of the CIA is authorized to invoke the National Security Act for purposes of Exemption 3
• holding that an agency's search was not inadequate just because it estimated it would find 251,000 to 775,000 pages of responsive documents but instead only located 115,000 pages
• noting that the plaintiff “does not dispute, nor could she, that Section 3024(i)(1) is a valid Exemption 3 statute”
• noting that Section 102A(i)(1) is an Exemption 3 withholding statute that mandates withholding of intelligence sources and methods
• noting that Section 102A(i)(1) is an Exemption 3 withholding statute that mandates withholding of intelligence sources and methods

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).