Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Affymetrix, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the district court’s holding that an applicant’s written description was adequate because the court erred in its claim construction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Abbvie Deutschland GmbH & Co., KG v. Janssen Biotech, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2014-07-01· cited 76×
• Koninklijke Philips Electronics N v. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-01-05· cited 32×
• Harari v. Lee
  Federal Circuit· 2011-09-01· cited 28×
• Streck, Inc. v. Research & Diagnostic Systems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2011-10-20· cited 16×
• Bamberg v. Dalvey
  Federal Circuit· 2016-03-09· cited 8×
• Cytologic, Inc. v. Biopheresis Gmbh
  District of Columbia· 2010-01-15· cited 7×
• Spine v. BIEDERMANN MOTECH GMBH
  District of Columbia· 2010-02-16· cited 6×
• Sears Ecological Applications Co. v. MLI Associates, LLC
  N.D. New York· 2009-09-01· cited 4×
• Eli Lilly and Co. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA
  S.D. Indiana· 2009-09-23· cited 4×
• Robertson v. Timmermans
  Federal Circuit· 2010-05-05· cited 3×
• Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2010-07-26· cited 3×
• Yeda Research and Development Co., Ltd. v. Abbott Gmbh & Co. Kg
  District of Columbia· 2015-04-15· cited 3×
• Quake v. Lo
  Federal Circuit· 2019-07-10· cited 3×
• W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 2011-12-14· cited 2×
• Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BCG Partners, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2012-02-09· cited 2×
• McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2011-08-17· cited 1×
• Ralph J. Lamson v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2013-03-15
• Spine v. Biedermann Motech Gmbh
  District of Columbia· 2010-11-15
• Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. University of Wyoming Research
  Federal Circuit· 2020-11-04

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2006-02-21· cited 3,273×
• Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1996-07-25· cited 2,428×
• Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1998-03-25· cited 1,536×
• Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments Company
  Federal Circuit· 1991-07-29· cited 365×
• Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2003-03-03· cited 332×
• Merck & Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2005-01-28· cited 236×
• Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2004-07-20· cited 207×
• Stanton J. Rowe v. Michael Dror and Paul Trescony
  Federal Circuit· 1997-04-21· cited 128×
• In re Oelrich
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1981-12-10· cited 99×
• Monsanto Company v. Scruggs
  Federal Circuit· 2006-08-16· cited 64×
• Conservolite, Inc. v. Don F. Widmayer
  Federal Circuit· 1994-06-21· cited 62×
• Estee Lauder Inc. v. L'oreal, S.A.
  Federal Circuit· 1997-11-03· cited 60×
• Bose Corporation v. Jbl, Inc. And Infinity Systems Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2001-12-17· cited 60×
• Darrel A. Mazzari, and Michael T. Sheedy v. James E. Rogan, Director, Patent and Trademark Office
  Federal Circuit· 2003-03-17· cited 36×
• In Re Richard F. Wright
  Federal Circuit· 1989-01-24· cited 34×
• Gordon Gould v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
  Federal Circuit· 1987-06-25· cited 31×
• Hitzeman v. Rutter
  Federal Circuit· 2001-03-21· cited 22×
• In Re Charles Spina
  Federal Circuit· 1992-09-15· cited 17×
• Mangosoft, Inc. v. Oracle Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-05-14· cited 11×