Skip to main content
· 9/15/1992

In Re Charles Spina

Citations

  • 975 F.2d 854
  • 24 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1142
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 21825
  • 1992 WL 220422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A claim is not interpreted one way in light of the specification in which it originally was granted, and another way in light of the specification into which it is copied as a proposed interference count.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Cowen, Lourie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.