Darrel A. Mazzari, and Michael T. Sheedy v. James E. Rogan, Director, Patent and Trademark Office

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a] decision by the PTO is reviewed on the administrative record of an agency hearing provided for by statute”
• “A section 145 review is distinct from a section 141 appeal in that it affords the applicant an opportunity to present additional evidence----”
• “A section 145 review is distinct from a section 141 appeal in that it affords the applicant an opportunity to present additional evidence.... ”
• “A section 145 review ... affords the applicant an opportunity to present additional evidence or argue the previous evidence afresh,” and “[i]f the parties choose to present additional evidence to the district court ... the district court would make de novo factual findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).