Skip to main content
· 4/11/1997

Aerotech, Inc. v. Estes Industries

Citations

  • 110 F.3d 1523
  • 37 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 867
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 6699
  • 1997 WL 170270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a defendant may not recover attorneys’ fees when a plaintiff dismisses an action with prejudice absent exceptional circumstances”
  • recognizing that fees and costs may be imposed for 23 a dismissal with prejudice in “exceptional circumstances”
  • holding that the court will “continue to adhere to the rule that a 24 defendant may not recover attorneys’ fees when a plaintiff dismisses an action with 25 prejudice”
  • determining that that fees may be awarded in “exceptional circumstances” where litigant repeatedly brings claims and dismissing them with prejudice, but court did not find exceptional circumstances in that case
  • finding that a denial of costs is not warranted simply because a lawsuit was not brought in bad faith, since “[a]ll parties to a federal action have an obligation to act in good faith and with proper purpose”
  • applying abuse of discretion standard to decision not to aw ard fees under Rule 41(a)(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, Baldock, Brorby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.