· 4/11/1997
Aerotech, Inc. v. Estes Industries
Citations
- 110 F.3d 1523
- 37 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 867
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 6699
- 1997 WL 170270
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “a defendant may not recover attorneys’ fees when a plaintiff dismisses an action with prejudice absent exceptional circumstances”
- recognizing that fees and costs may be imposed for 23 a dismissal with prejudice in “exceptional circumstances”
- holding that the court will “continue to adhere to the rule that a 24 defendant may not recover attorneys’ fees when a plaintiff dismisses an action with 25 prejudice”
- determining that that fees may be awarded in “exceptional circumstances” where litigant repeatedly brings claims and dismissing them with prejudice, but court did not find exceptional circumstances in that case
- finding that a denial of costs is not warranted simply because a lawsuit was not brought in bad faith, since “[a]ll parties to a federal action have an obligation to act in good faith and with proper purpose”
- applying abuse of discretion standard to decision not to aw ard fees under Rule 41(a)(2)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tacha, Baldock, Brorby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.