Charles N. Schwarz, Jr. v. Harry Folloder, Alexander Grant & Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that defendants are 18 See R. Doc. 2-3, ¶¶ 5-6. prejudiced by unnecessary litigation expenses
• noting that “[a]n adjudication in favor of the defendants, by court or jury, can rise no higher than this”
• rejecting parties' attempt to attach a new affidavit as an appendix to their brief as an improper \attempt to introduce new evidence on appeal\
• describing the denial of costs as \in the nature of a penalty\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “Having wrongfully kicked the snow loose at the top, the Plaintiff must bear the consequences of the avalanche at the bottom.”
• quoting, among other things, Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752, 766 (1980)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).