Fifth Circuit· 5/5/2006
Pacheco v. Mineta
Citations
- 448 F.3d 783
- 2006 WL 1195989
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that courts review scope of administrative complaint was “fact-specific” to determine what investigation that complaint “can reasonably be expected to trigger”
- holding that “Rule 54(d)(1) contains a strong presumption that the prevailing party will be awarded costs”
- holding that a plaintiff need not “recite a specific incantation to exhaust his or her administrative remedies before the proper agency”
- holding that an employee failed to exhaust a claim of disparate impact because the EEOC charge alleged only disparate treatment and identified no neutral employment policy
- holding that the prima facie case is relevant for determining whether an investigation would reasonably be expected to grow out of the facts alleged in an EEOC charge
- holding that allegations of only past disparate treatment and no identification of a neutral employment policy could not lead to an EEOC investigation into disparate-impact discrimination sufficient to satisfy the administrative exhaustion requirement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garwood, Prado, Owen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
153 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kendale L. Adams v. City of IndianapolisSeventh Circuit· 2014-02-04· cited 1,086×
- Luca Cicalese v. Univ of Texas Medical BranFifth Circuit· 2019-05-16· cited 408×
- Prairie View A&M University v. Diljit K. ChathaTexas Supreme Court· 2012-08-31· cited 358×
- McClain v. Lufkin Industries, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2008-03-10· cited 258×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Boh Bros. Construction Co.Fifth Circuit· 2013-09-27· cited 183×
- University of Texas v. PoindexterTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-07-03· cited 149×
- James Reynolds v. Daniel M. TangherliniSeventh Circuit· 2013-12-12· cited 125×
- Lois Davis v. Fort Bend CountyFifth Circuit· 2018-06-20· cited 121×
- Steve Moore v. Citgo Refining & Chemicals CFifth Circuit· 2013-11-12· cited 94×
- Timothy Patton v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc, eFifth Circuit· 2017-10-24· cited 85×
- Blanca Ruiz v. Meagan BrennanFifth Circuit· 2017-03-16· cited 82×
- Bartosh v. Sam Houston State UniversityTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-06-30· cited 77×
- Terrence Filer v. Michael DonleyFifth Circuit· 2012-08-09· cited 68×
- Jennings v. Towers WatsonFifth Circuit· 2021-08-25· cited 68×
- United States Ex Rel. Long v. GSDMIdea City, L.L.C.Fifth Circuit· 2015-12-01· cited 63×
- Larry R. Hedlund v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2019-06-28· cited 61×
- Noris Rogers v. Pearland Indep School DistrictFifth Circuit· 2016-06-28· cited 57×
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Tenth Circuit· 2011-12-21· cited 51×
- Ramona Smith v. Chrysler Group, L.L.C.Fifth Circuit· 2018-11-26· cited 48×
- Rodriguez v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2017-03-24· cited 46×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 4,895×
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court· 1971-03-08· cited 3,596×
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court· 1991-01-22· cited 3,247×
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-02-24· cited 2,939×
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 1,934×
- Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1970-08-17· cited 1,032×
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 871×
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court· 1981-03-09· cited 430×
- Mary DOLLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert E. RUBIN, Secretary of the Department of the Treasury, Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1995-12-14· cited 259×
- Rush Pettway and Peter J. Wrenn v. American Cast Iron Pipe CompanyFifth Circuit· 1969-10-07· cited 256×
- Charles N. Schwarz, Jr. v. Harry Folloder, Alexander Grant & CompanyFifth Circuit· 1985-08-01· cited 248×
- W. B. COKE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC., Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1981-03-23· cited 202×
- White & White, Inc., Bluefield Supply Co., Crocker-Fels Co., and Ransdell Surgical, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.Sixth Circuit· 1986-03-25· cited 201×
- Teague v. BakkerFourth Circuit· 1994-09-23· cited 158×
- Dorothy J. Fine v. Gaf Chemical CorporationFifth Circuit· 1993-08-06· cited 148×
- The Association Of Mexican-American Educators v. State Of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2000-10-30· cited 146×
- Nancy C. Cherry v. Champion International Corporation, Equal Employment Advisory Council, Amicus CuriaeFourth Circuit· 1999-07-27· cited 136×
- Gomes v. Avco Corp.Second Circuit· 1992-06-01· cited 136×
- Aerotech, Inc. v. Estes IndustriesTenth Circuit· 1997-04-11· cited 132×
- Laura FELLOWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSAL RESTAURANTS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1983-03-28· cited 119×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.