Skip to main content
· 3/3/2009

In Re Williams Securities Litigation-WCG Subclass

Citations

  • 558 F.3d 1144
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5279
  • 2009 WL 514097

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[a]ll § 1920 requires is that the generation of taxable materials be ‘reasonably necessary for use in’ the case ‘at the time the expenses were incurred.’”
  • “A district court abuses its discretion where it (1) commits legal error, (2) relies on clearly erroneous factual findings, or (3) where no rational basis ekists in the evidence to support its ruling.”
  • “As the district court correctly noted, the clerk's guidelines do not purport to be an authoritative exposition of the costs allowable under applicable law and they are not binding on the district court.”
  • “[A] bill of costs is initially filed with the clerk rather than with the court.” (quoting Furr v. AT&T Techs., Inc, 824 F.2d 1537, 1550 n.11 (10th Cir. 1987)); see also id. (noting that the clerk helda hearing on the requests for costs before issuing orders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McConnell, Anderson, Baldock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.