First Circuit· 3/31/2010
Adams v. Adams
Citations
- 601 F.3d 1
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 6632
- 2010 WL 1224233
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- assuming that relatedness prong was satisfied where borrowed funds which, were reflected in promissory note were provided by Massachusetts resident who was a party to the note, and basis of suit was failure to pay note
- “[W]e have held that a defendant’s entering into a contract with a resident of the forum state cannot automatically establish minimum contacts.”
- “[T]he defendant’s contacts are central to each [factor] of the tripartite analysis.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch, Torruella, Stahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- C.W. Downer & Company v. Bioriginal Food & Science CorpFirst Circuit· 2014-11-12· cited 154×
- Bluetarp Financial, Inc. v. Matrix Construction Co., Inc.First Circuit· 2013-03-01· cited 80×
- Vapotherm, Inc. v. SantiagoFirst Circuit· 2022-06-28· cited 61×
- Adelson v. HananelFirst Circuit· 2011-07-13· cited 59×
- Lechoslaw v. Bank of America, N.A.First Circuit· 2010-08-30· cited 34×
- LP Solutions LLC v. DuchossoisFirst Circuit· 2018-10-24· cited 25×
- Henderson v. Laser Spine Institute LLCD. Maine· 2011-09-28· cited 16×
- Medici v. Lifespan Corp.D. Massachusetts· 2017-03-06· cited 16×
- Hilsinger Co. v. FBW Investments, LLCD. Massachusetts· 2015-06-17· cited 14×
- Media3 Technologies, LLC v. CableSouth Media III, LLCD. Massachusetts· 2014-03-12· cited 13×
- Stars for Art Production Fz, LLC v. Dandana, LLCD. Massachusetts· 2011-08-22· cited 10×
- Photographic Illustrators Corp. v. A.W. Graham Lumber, LLCD. Massachusetts· 2016-06-27· cited 10×
- Art Technology Group, Inc. v. Puritan's Pride, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2010-05-27· cited 4×
- Confederate Motors, Inc. v. TernyD. Massachusetts· 2011-07-18· cited 4×
- Rissman Hendricks & Oliverio, LLP v. MIV Therapeutics Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2012-09-28· cited 4×
- Petedge, Inc. v. Fortress Secure Solutions, LLCD. Massachusetts· 2015-11-17· cited 2×
- Cioffi v. Gilbert Enterprises, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2012-12-11· cited 2×
- Equipo De Baloncesto Capitanes De Arecibo, Inc. v. Premier Basketball League, Inc.D. Puerto Rico· 2010-04-09
- BT Prime Ltd. v. Bos. Techs. Powered By Forexware LLC (In re BT Prime Ltd.)D. Massachusetts· 2019-03-29
- Vapotherm, Inc., Plaintiff v. Clayton Santiago, DefendantD. New Hampshire· 2021-06-24
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court· 1941-01-20· cited 3,141×
- Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Joseph M. AliotoFirst Circuit· 1994-04-13· cited 597×
- Foster-Miller, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox CanadaFirst Circuit· 1995-02-09· cited 449×
- Richard A. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A. Ronald L. Motley, Scruggs, Millette, Bozeman & Dent P.A. Richard F. ScruggsFirst Circuit· 2002-06-17· cited 432×
- United States v. Swiss American Bank, Ltd.First Circuit· 2001-12-27· cited 427×
- Phillips Exeter Academy v. Howard Phillips Fund, Inc.First Circuit· 1999-11-19· cited 366×
- Phillips v. Prairie Eye CenterFirst Circuit· 2008-06-12· cited 256×
- Adelson v. HananelFirst Circuit· 2007-12-05· cited 250×
- The Ealing Corporation v. Harrods LimitedFirst Circuit· 1986-05-16· cited 119×
- Moelis v. Berkshire Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-05-22· cited 10×
- Rokowsky v. GordonD. Massachusetts· 1980-11-19· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.