State v. Folck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[c]onsideration of matters outside the record may, under certain circumstances, require a new trial”
• noting that “[c]onsideration of matters outside the record may, under certain circumstances, require a new trial”
• noting that “[c]onsideration of matters outside the record may, under certain circumstances, require a new trial”
• affirming conviction when victim held over extended period of several hours and was taken to secluded spot where detection was unlikely and substantially increased risk of harm if victim tried to defend herself or escape
• jury’s discussion of facts not contained in the record, including facts bearing on credibility of witnesses, could not have influenced verdict
• Evidence of confinement sufficient where defendant drove victim down a secluded gravel road in the country and sexually abused her

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).