Skip to main content

Earnest v. State

Citations

  • 508 N.W.2d 630
  • 1993 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 254
  • 1993 WL 482308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that restitution is “purely” statutory
  • “Any alleged errors relating to restitution must be resolved on direct appeal or in a chapter 910 proceeding.”
  • \We hold that this subsection unambiguously excludes claims relating to restitution in postconviction proceedings.\
  • “[T]his subsection unambiguously excludes claims relating to restitution in postconviction proceedings.”
  • “[T]his subsection unambiguously excludes claims relating to restitution in postconviction proceedings.”
  • attorneys not expected to object to their own representation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Larson, Neuman, Andreasen, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.