District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/14/1994
Callaway v. State
Citations
- 642 So. 2d 636
- 1994 WL 497961
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that defendants could retroactively challenge their sentences under Hale within two years from the time Hale became final, which was February 9, 1994
- discussing why a Witt analysis may not apply to a rule 3.800(a) claim
- wherein the second district held that the two-year time limit for filing such a motion begins to run upon Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), becoming final
- decision is \constitutional in nature\ if based primarily upon constitutional analysis
- postconviction issue requiring evidentiary hearing must be resolved under rule 3.850
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Altenbernd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. CallawaySupreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-20· cited 219×
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-02-04· cited 60×
- Burgess v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-17· cited 48×
- Bunkley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-11-21· cited 15×
- Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-02· cited 13×
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-31· cited 13×
- Lock v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-01· cited 8×
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-16· cited 8×
- Hubbard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-06· cited 7×
- House v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-08· cited 7×
- Poole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-21· cited 7×
- New v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-12-06· cited 7×
- Sanchez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-20· cited 6×
- Flores v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-25· cited 6×
- Rosier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-09· cited 6×
- Dean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-14· cited 5×
- Massey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-22· cited 5×
- Stocker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-16· cited 5×
- Stevens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-18· cited 4×
- Borders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-07· cited 4×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 2,898×
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 2,416×
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 1,316×
- Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-02-24· cited 600×
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 430×
- Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-07-24· cited 342×
- Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-10-30· cited 271×
- Palmer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-09-01· cited 230×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-04-02· cited 169×
- Judge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-20· cited 145×
- State v. GlennSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-02-15· cited 60×
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-05-03· cited 39×
- McCuiston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-11-17· cited 38×
- Bass v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-01· cited 33×
- Tafero v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-11-21· cited 26×
- Poiteer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-10-20· cited 22×
- Parker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-18· cited 20×
- Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-13· cited 20×
- Nowlin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-12· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.