Johnson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Johnson’s claim is facially sufficient and can be brought pursuant to rule 3.800(a) because he alleges that it can be determined from the face of the record that the sentences are illegal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Canavan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-17· cited 5×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-18· cited 2×
• Watson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-16· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hale v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 430×
• Adams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-02· cited 13×