Skip to main content

Adams v. Clinton

Citations

  • 26 F. Supp. 2d 156
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18163
  • 1998 WL 792464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting request for three judge-panel where plaintiffs were “challenging their existing allocation of zero representatives”
  • \These plaintiffs . . . challenge their existing allocation of zero representatives.\ (emphasis omitted)
  • “These plaintiffs ... challenge their existing allocation of zero representatives.” (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oberdorfer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.