Supreme Court· 6/26/1992

Franklin v. Massachusetts

Citations

505 U.S. 788
112 S. Ct. 2767
120 L. Ed. 2d 636
1992 U.S. LEXIS 4531
6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 650
60 U.S.L.W. 4781
92 Daily Journal DAR 8897
92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5553

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that separation of powers concerns prevent the application of the APA to the President
holding that the court could review whether an executive order conflicted with a federal statute where plaintiffs had sought to enjoin executive branch officials implementing the order
holding that \in general 'this court has no jurisdiction of a bill to enjoin the President in the performance of his official duties.' \
holding that 22 it is black letter law that courts cannot review Presidential actions under the APA
holding that “in general ‘this court has no jurisdiction of a bill to enjoin the President in the performance of his official duties.’”
holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over plaintiff’s challenge to an executive order where plaintiff sought to enjoin only the president and not any executive officers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor, Rehnquist, White, Scalia, Thomas, Blackmun, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Sou-Tek

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

593 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Franklin v. Massachusetts

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.