District of Columbia· 3/24/1999
Adams v. Clinton
Citations
- 40 F. Supp. 2d 1
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4147
- 1999 WL 176475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to consider motion as a request to amend or supplement complaint when no proposed amendment was appended to the motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garland, Kollar, Kotelly, Oberdorfer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court· 1974-03-25· cited 2,844×
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1994-03-01· cited 1,980×
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 1,401×
- Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 1,061×
- Allee v. MedranoSupreme Court· 1974-05-20· cited 501×
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1960-03-07· cited 196×
- Don Morrow v. District of Columbia, in the Matter of Harry T. Alexander, Judge, District of Columbia Court of General SessionsD.C. Circuit· 1969-04-18· cited 169×
- Public Service Commission v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1941-04-28· cited 83×
- Frederick J. Diven v. Amalgamated Transit Union International and Local 689, Amalgamated Transit UnionD.C. Circuit· 1994-11-01· cited 40×
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict of Columbia· 1993-01-05· cited 10×
- Adams v. ClintonDistrict of Columbia· 1998-11-06· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.