Skip to main content

Achurra v. Achurra

Citations

  • 80 So. 3d 1080
  • 2012 WL 513023
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that husband’s argument that trial court relied on testimony and evidence from a prior proceeding without proper judicial notice was not preserved for appellate review because the husband did not object at the hearing
  • consujering the sufficiency of the evidence for the first time on appeal and reversing where the final judgment was not supported by competent, substantial evidence
  • “Our review of the trial court’s conclusion of law that the petitioner is entitled to a final judgment of injunction against domestic violence is de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton, Ray, Rowe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Achurra v. Achurra

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.