Skip to main content

Owens v. Owens

Citations

  • 973 So. 2d 1169
  • 2007 WL 2456208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claim that a “final judgment lacks sufficient findings of fact” must be brought to the attention of a trial court by proper motion for the claim to be preserved for appellate review
  • holding that appellant's argument that final judgment lacked sufficient findings was not preserved for appellate review because appellant did not raise it \in a motion for rehearing or by other means available in the trial court\
  • holding party's failure to challenge adequacy of factual findings in the trial court rendered issue unpreserved for appellate review
  • affirming where appellate challenge to adequacy of trial court’s findings in final judgment not preserved by motion for rehearing below
  • treating a complaint that the trial court failed to make adequate findings of fact as unpreserved because it was not raised by a motion for rehearing
  • because the appellant failed to challenge the adequacy of the finding in a motion for rehearing, it failed to preserve the issue for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.