Celentano v. Banker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant new trial on grounds that were not preserved for review or fundamental error.
• holding trial court lacked discretion to grant motion for new trial to plaintiff in personal injury action based on improper admission of prejudicial testimony, where error was not preserved for review, and was not fundamental
• finding trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant a new trial on grounds not preserved for review or fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Achurra v. Achurra
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-17· cited 14×
• Hernandez v. Feliciano
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-23· cited 5×
• Phillip Morris, Inc. v. Janoff
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-27· cited 3×
• Conklin Shows, Inc. v. Llanes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-09· cited 1×
• Martinez v. Poly-Ply Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-25· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• J.B. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-01-22· cited 85×
• Hagan v. Sun Bank of Mid-Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-19· cited 46×
• Goutis v. Express Transport, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-03· cited 41×
• Wasden v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-12· cited 37×
• Murphy v. Intern. Robotics Systems
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-11· cited 19×
• KMart Corp. v. Hayes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-01· cited 6×
• O'Brien v. Florida Birth-Related Neuro.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-18· cited 6×