Celentano v. Banker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant new trial on grounds that were not preserved for review or fundamental error.
• holding trial court lacked discretion to grant motion for new trial to plaintiff in personal injury action based on improper admission of prejudicial testimony, where error was not preserved for review, and was not fundamental
• finding trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant a new trial on grounds not preserved for review or fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).