Mize v. Mize

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to reverse due to absence of findings required by statute where appellant failed to bring deficiency to attention of trial court
• adequacy of factual findings unpreserved where former husband failed to challenge their sufficiency by a motion for rehearing or other post-judgment pleading

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Achurra v. Achurra
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-17· cited 14×
• TIMOTHY RICHARD FOX v. PAMELA SUE FOX
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-19· cited 13×
• Robert N. Badgley, Jr. v. Maria Belen Sanchez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-20· cited 10×
• Furr v. Furr
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-22· cited 6×
• Michael Carman Byers v. Brantley Dubose Byers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-10-22· cited 3×
• Scott A. Brock, Former Husband v. Carolyn Ann Brock, Former Wife
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-11· cited 3×
• Mary Grace Vinson v. Tommy Junior Vinson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-11-07
• Mary Grace Vinson v. Tommy Junior Vinson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-01-07

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Owens v. Owens
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-31· cited 30×
• Simmons v. Simmons
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-31· cited 27×
• Welch v. Welch
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-11-30· cited 7×