Skip to main content
· 2/6/2004

Abramson v. Juniper Networks, Inc.

Citations

  • 9 Cal. Rptr. 3d 422
  • 115 Cal. App. 4th 638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[plaintiffs ability to negotiate other aspects- of his employment with Juniper has no bearing on whether he had the power to negotiate the' arbitration provision”
  • separately analyzing an agreement on public policy grounds and unconscionability, and concluding that “the agreement [was] both illegal on public policy grounds and unconscionable on ordinary contractual grounds”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAdams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.