Skip to main content
· 1/8/2004

Gutierrez v. Autowest, Inc.

Citations

  • 7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 267
  • 114 Cal. App. 4th 77

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an arbitration provision may not impede statutory rights under the CLRA
  • holding that an arbitration provision may not impede statutory rights under the CLRA
  • holding that imposition of up-front arbitration fees is unconscionable because it would prevent consumers from enforcing rights under CLRA
  • holding that an arbitra- tion provision may not impede statutory rights under the CLRA
  • stating that plaintiff was “never given or shown a copy of the arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association (AAA), the designated arbitration provider”
  • finding unconscionability where the plaintiffs presented substantial evidence that the costs of arbitration exceeded their ability to pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.