Skip to main content
· 7/27/2004

Nyulassy v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

Citations

  • 16 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296
  • 120 Cal. App. 4th 1267
  • 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6770
  • 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1001
  • 2004 Daily Journal DAR 9159
  • 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even where an employee is represented by counsel during contract negotiation, the contract may still be found procedurally unconscionable where no opportunity for meaningful negotiation exists
  • holding that provision in arbitration agreement imposing 180-day limitation period was substantively unconscionable
  • finding procedural unconscionability even where employee was represented by a lawyer in settlement negotiations
  • finding procedural unconscionability even where employee was represented by a lawyer in settlement negotiations
  • finding statute of limitations waiver that limited the time for bringing claims to 180 days and applied unilaterally to the employee to be so one-sided so as to be substantively unconscionable
  • finding procedural unconscionability even where employee was represented by a lawyer in settlement negotiations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.