· 7/27/2004
Nyulassy v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
Citations
- 16 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296
- 120 Cal. App. 4th 1267
- 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6770
- 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1001
- 2004 Daily Journal DAR 9159
- 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that even where an employee is represented by counsel during contract negotiation, the contract may still be found procedurally unconscionable where no opportunity for meaningful negotiation exists
- holding that provision in arbitration agreement imposing 180-day limitation period was substantively unconscionable
- finding procedural unconscionability even where employee was represented by a lawyer in settlement negotiations
- finding procedural unconscionability even where employee was represented by a lawyer in settlement negotiations
- finding statute of limitations waiver that limited the time for bringing claims to 180 days and applied unilaterally to the employee to be so one-sided so as to be substantively unconscionable
- finding procedural unconscionability even where employee was represented by a lawyer in settlement negotiations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walsh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.