Universal Ideas Corp. v. Esty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the assignment of error was unreviewable where the appellant did not designate a transcript of the proceedings and the appellate arguments did not “turn solely on questions of law”
• explaining that the assign- ment of error was unreviewable where the appellant did not designate a transcript of the proceedings and the appellate arguments did not “turn solely on questions of law”
• explaining that the assign- ment of error was unreviewable where the appellant did not designate a transcript of the proceedings and the appellate arguments did not “turn solely on questions of law”
• explaining that the court was not able to review an assign- ment of error without a transcript of the proceedings when the appellate arguments did not “turn solely on questions of law”
• explaining that the court was not able to review an assignment of error with- out a transcript of the proceedings and where the appellate arguments did not “turn solely on questions of law”
• declining to address assignment of error where the appellant failed to designate appropriate transcript

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).