· 4/2/1934
A. Magnano Co. v. Hamilton
Citations
- 292 U.S. 40
- 54 S. Ct. 599
- 78 L. Ed. 1109
- 1934 U.S. LEXIS 695
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that the words of an Act \are to be given their ordinary meaning unless the context shows that they are differently used\
- applying Child Labor to a due process challenge to a state statute
- the single premise that the amount of a tax is so excessive as to bring about the destruction of a business has been “uniformly rejected as furnishing no juridical ground for striking down a taxing act”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sutherland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.