Supreme Court· 6/17/2021

California v. Texas

Citations

593 U.S. 659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Texas courts may look to federal standing requirements for guidance
holding that states lacked standing to challenge provision of the Affordable Care Act requiring minimum insurance coverage because their alleged injuries were caused by an unchallenged portion of the Affordable Care Act and were not fairly traceable to the challenged provision
noting that the Secretary of Health and Human Services “has no 13 power to enforce” the provision against them
explaining that the DJA, on its own, “does not provide a court with jurisdiction”
explaining that “[r]emedies” traditionally “operate with respect to specific parties” (cita- tion omitted)
explaining that “[r]emedies” traditionally “operate with respect to specific parties” (cita- tion omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephen Breyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named California v. Texas

20 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.