Zule v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Error for an appellate court to refuse to consider a videotape that was designated to be included in the appellate record and relied upon in the party's appellate briefing but not physically forwarded to that appellate court.
• Error for an appellate court to refuse to consider a videotape that was designated to be included in the appellate record and relied upon in the party’s appellate briefing but not physically forwarded to that appellate court.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• School District of Kansas City v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2010-08-03· cited 19×
• Lopez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2010-03-10· cited 16×
• Ortiz v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1993-03-18· cited 7×
• DeGay v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1996-06-05· cited 7×
• Adams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-11-10· cited 2×
• State v. David Schlemeyer
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2008-05-21
• Valanty v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-22