Zule v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Error for an appellate court to refuse to consider a videotape that was designated to be included in the appellate record and relied upon in the party's appellate briefing but not physically forwarded to that appellate court.
• Error for an appellate court to refuse to consider a videotape that was designated to be included in the appellate record and relied upon in the party’s appellate briefing but not physically forwarded to that appellate court.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).