Zieve v. Hairston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the matter of plaintiff's hair replacement treatment was one that a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities would find offensive and objectionable under the circumstances
• concluding that emotional damages, including embarrassment and ridicule flowing from alleged fraudulent representations, constitute actual damages sufficient to support a fraud claim
• holding that the matter of plaintiff’s hair replacement treatment was one that a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities would find offensive and objectionable under the circumstances
• compensatory damage award of $250,000 not excessive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).