City of Atlanta v. Hofrichter/Stiakakis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a damages award for nuisance because “even though the evidence is such as to authorize a greater or lesser award than that actually made, the appellate court will not disturb it unless it is so flagrant as to shock the conscience”
• “Where enumerated errors on appeal attempt to raise for the first time questions not raised in the trial court, they present nothing for decision.”
• the any evidence standard of review applies to bench trials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).