Skip to main content
· 11/5/2008

Perry Golf Course Development, LLC v. HOUS. AUTH. OF CITY OF ATLANTA

Citations

  • 670 S.E.2d 171
  • 294 Ga. App. 387
  • 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3578
  • 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 1197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that one who benefits from the performance of a contract is not sufficient to create third-party beneficiary status
  • noting that one who benefits from the performance of a contract is not sufficient to create third-party beneficiary status
  • noting that one who benefits from the performance of a contract is not sufficient to create third-party beneficiary status
  • noting that one who benefits from the performance of a contract is not sufficient to create third-party beneficiary status
  • upholding judgment on the pleadings of third-party beneficiary claim when contract attached to the complaint showed on its face that plaintiff was not an intended beneficiary
  • upholding judgment on the pleadings of third party beneficiary claim when contract attached to the complaint showed on 17 We describe the allegations against the Payors in Division 3, supra. 22 its face that plaintiff was not an intended beneficiary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andrews, Bernes, Ruffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.