Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 3/25/2013

Zhang v. Baidu.Com Inc.

Citations

  • 932 F. Supp. 2d 561
  • 2013 WL 1195257
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding FedEx service to Central Authority insufficient to overcome China’s refusal to serve documents under Article 13 when China also objected to direct service-by-mail under Article 10(a)
  • finding no direct service on China after its Central Authority provided return certificate under Article 6, but “expressly invoked Article 13 and refused to effect service pursuant to the Convention on the ground that doing so would ‘infringe’ its ‘sovereignty or security’”
  • describing the three conditions in Article 15 as “mandatory”
  • listing the statutory bases for Plaintiffs’ claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Furman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.