Gurung v. Malhotra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Court granted motion for alternative service five months after complaint was filed
• stating that if a country refused to complete service pursuant to Article 13, “such a refusal would preclude service of the complaint as contrary to the terms of the Convention and therefore impermissible under Rule 4(f)(3)”
• authorizing email service despite India's objection to Article 10(a), because “India did not expressly object to electronic mail as a means of service”
• permitting service by email to a defendant located in India and noting “objection to service through postal channels does not amount to an express rejection of service via electronic mail”
• permitting alternative means of service on private defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Joseph v. HDMJ Restaurant, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2013-09-09· cited 71×
• Sulzer Mixpac AG v. Medenstar Industries Co.
  S.D. New York· 2015-11-27· cited 69×
• Jian Zhang v. Baidu.com Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2013-06-07· cited 47×
• Lexmark International, Inc. v. Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC
  S.D. Ohio· 2013-12-02· cited 31×
• United States v. Myers
  E.D. New York· 2017-02-22· cited 25×
• Zhang v. Baidu.Com Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2013-03-25· cited 20×
• Lexmark International, Inc. v. Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC
  S.D. Ohio· 2013-09-11· cited 19×
• Hardy Exploration & Production (India), Inc. v. Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas
  District of Columbia· 2016-11-30· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
  Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
• Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-03-20· cited 1,036×
• Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 735×
• Greyhound Exhibitgroup, Inc. v. E.L.U.L. Realty Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1992-08-24· cited 537×
• Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira Levine
  Second Circuit· 1986-04-07· cited 211×
• Burda Media, Inc. v. Viertel
  Second Circuit· 2005-08-05· cited 116×
• Luessenhop v. Clinton County
  Second Circuit· 2006-10-11· cited 65×

Other cases named Gurung v. Malhotra

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Gurung v. Malhotra
  S.D. New York· 2012-03-16· cited 37×