UNITE NATIONAL RETIREMENT FUND v. Ariela, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that a central authority’s certificate of service precludes a defendant from arguing that service did not comport with the foreign country’s law
• declining “to look behind the certificate of service to adjudicate the issues of Mexican procedural law that the parties have raised through their submission of conflicting expert statements on the issue”
• “[T]he Second Circuit has expressly rejected . . . formalistic challenges to service of process carried out by a State’s Central Authority under the Hague Convention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).