Zellars v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]his Court’s earlier dismissal of the claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is a final judgment on the merits for res judicata purposes.\
• also noting that “the case law is split as to whether injuries that are non- physical in nature are covered under the [FECA] such as the claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress” and is thus a decision reserved for the Secretary
• describing split in case law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).