Skip to main content
· 12/13/1983

I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan a v. Industrial Gear Manufacturing Company

Citations

  • 723 F.2d 944
  • 232 U.S. App. D.C. 418
  • 5 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1251
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prior judgment on the merits “bars the relitigation of the claim and any other claims that could have been submitted to the Court” (emphasis added)
  • noting that claim preclusion only applies to claims that “might have been litigated” in the prior action
  • noting that res judicata “forecloses all that which might have been litigated previously (citation omitted)
  • noting that res judicata \forecloses all that which might have been litigated previously\
  • noting that res judicata “forecloses all that which might have been litigated previously”
  • noting that res judicata “forecloses all that which might have been litigated previously”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.