· 12/13/1983
I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan a v. Industrial Gear Manufacturing Company
Citations
- 723 F.2d 944
- 232 U.S. App. D.C. 418
- 5 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1251
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a prior judgment on the merits “bars the relitigation of the claim and any other claims that could have been submitted to the Court” (emphasis added)
- noting that claim preclusion only applies to claims that “might have been litigated” in the prior action
- noting that res judicata “forecloses all that which might have been litigated previously (citation omitted)
- noting that res judicata \forecloses all that which might have been litigated previously\
- noting that res judicata “forecloses all that which might have been litigated previously”
- noting that res judicata “forecloses all that which might have been litigated previously”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tamm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.