District of Columbia· 9/6/2007
Zeigler v. Potter
Citations
- 510 F. Supp. 2d 9
- 19 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1199
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65329
- 2007 WL 2493518
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- setting out prima facie requirements for hostile work environment based on disability
- “it is in the interest of Indian tribes to be free from bureaucratic oversight of their economic endeavors in all but a narrow category of circumstances”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rosemary M. Collyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Franklin v. PotterDistrict of Columbia· 2009-03-04· cited 123×
- Marshall v. PotterDistrict of Columbia· 2009-07-14· cited 24×
- Redmon v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict of Columbia· 2015-02-18· cited 23×
- Bowden v. CloughDistrict of Columbia· 2009-09-29· cited 16×
- Zeigler v. PotterDistrict of Columbia· 2009-08-13· cited 8×
- Bowden v. SmallDistrict of Columbia· 2009-09-29
- Forest County Potawatomi Community v. United States of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2018-09-10
- Brett v. BrennanDistrict of Columbia· 2019-08-27
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 7,269×
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court· 2001-04-23· cited 3,456×
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonD.C. Circuit· 2002-08-01· cited 1,521×
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 2002-01-08· cited 1,389×
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 1,379×
- Dennis Diamond, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Brian Atwood, Administrator, Agency for International Development, Appellant/cross-AppelleeD.C. Circuit· 1995-01-20· cited 493×
- Macharia, Merania v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2003-07-11· cited 441×
- Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Development v. AshcroftD.C. Circuit· 2003-06-20· cited 439×
- Donald Barth v. Bruce S. Gelb, Director, United States Information AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1993-08-27· cited 238×
- Lester v. NatsiosDistrict of Columbia· 2003-10-07· cited 225×
- Flemmings, Virginia v. Howard UniversityD.C. Circuit· 1999-12-14· cited 117×
- Scarborough v. NatsiosDistrict of Columbia· 2002-03-20· cited 58×
- Duncan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2003-04-01· cited 47×
- Pantazes v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia· 2005-03-31· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.