Zeagler v. Buckley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hen . . . claims are so interrelated that identical or substantially overlapping discovery would occur, there is no sound reason to deny recovery of such legal fees.”
• when claims are indistinguishable the court may award fees for both 18 claims even if, in other circumstances, recovery would not be permitted for one of the 19 claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).