Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying “percentage of success” test given the complex nature of the “third-party posture of this litigation and its multiple parties and claims”
• applying “percentage of success” test given the complex nature of the “third-party posture of this litigation and its multiple parties and claims”
• finding use of “percentage of success factor . . . was not an abuse of discretion,” noting “the complex and picayune issues resolved by the jury” and “[g]iven the third-party posture of this litigation and its multiple parties and claims”
• finding use of “’percentage of success factor’ . . . was not an abuse of discretion,” noting “the complex and picayune issues resolved by the jury” and “[g]iven the third-party posture of this litigation and its multiple parties and claims”
• award of attorney fees upheld if any reasonable basis for award
• “Given the third-party posture of this 20 litigation and its multiple claims and parties, we hold that the trial court’s method of 21 determining who was the ‘successful party’ as to each claim was not an abuse of 22 discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).