Skip to main content
· 9/11/1990

Morrison v. Shanwick International Corp.

Citations

  • 804 P.2d 768
  • 167 Ariz. 39
  • 69 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 64
  • 1990 Ariz. App. LEXIS 300

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining “contest” to mean an action taken to “deny an adverse claim or assert a defense to it in a court proceeding”
  • explaining any objection to a procedural defect in the filing of a motion for summary judgment is waived where the aggrieved party fails to timely object
  • considering a request for attorney fees made pursuant to § 12-341.01
  • Courts must ensure “[n]otice and an opportunity to be heard . . . as provided by the regular and established rules of procedure.”
  • “[A] 26 contested action is one in which the defendant has appeared and generally defends 27 against the claims and demands made by the plaintiff.”
  • “The requirements of timely notice and meaningful opportunity to be heard certainly envision more than contemporaneous notice and opportunity to be heard on an unsuspecting and unprepared party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Voss, Eubank, Shelley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.