Skip to main content
· 2/13/1996

Zarabia v. Bradshaw

Citations

  • 912 P.2d 5
  • 185 Ariz. 1
  • 1996 Ariz. LEXIS 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that county's practice of appointing private attorneys to represent criminal defendants regardless of attorneys’ skills violated defendants’ constitutional rights to adequate representation
  • holding that Yuma County’s system of random appointment of private attorneys to represent indigent clients offended an Arizona statute and rule of criminal procedure because it failed to consider the skill-level required for each case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Zlaket, Moeller, Martone, Corcoran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.