Ninth Circuit· 8/14/2020
Yvette Akosung v. William Barr
Citations
- 970 F.3d 1095
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that asylum and withholding of removal are unavailable if a petitioner could avoid persecution by relocating internally
- explaining that asylum and withholding of removal are unavailable if the applicant could avoid persecution by relocating within the country and it would be reasonable to expect the applicant to do so
- explaining that the consideration of relocation in the CAT context differs from relocation in the asylum and withholding of removal contexts because, unlike asylum and withholding of removal, “[t]he CAT regulation does not bar relief if an applicant could relocate”
- reviewing the agency’s conclusion about the safety of relocation for substantial evidence
- asylum and withholding of removal are unavailable if a petitioner could avoid persecution by relocating internally
- “[W]e do not believe that an applicant can be said to have the ability to ‘relocate’ within her home country if she would have to remain in hiding there.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Josue Umana-Escobar v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2023-03-17· cited 343×
- Francisca Villegas Sanchez v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2021-03-11· cited 146×
- Maria Rodriguez-Tornes v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2021-04-05· cited 73×
- Chanpreet Kaur v. Robert WilkinsonNinth Circuit· 2021-01-29· cited 70×
- Ravinder Kaur v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2021-06-21· cited 37×
- Uribe Andrade v. GarlandNinth Circuit· 2024-03-01· cited 34×
- Peter Udo v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2022-05-04· cited 27×
- Shamsher Singh v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2023-01-12
- Josue Umana-Escobar v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2023-05-23
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court· 1992-01-22· cited 8,324×
- M-E-V-GBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2014-07-01· cited 1,009×
- Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2001-06-05· cited 786×
- Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2001-12-05· cited 738×
- Takky Zubeda v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2003-06-23· cited 642×
- Ukashu Nuru, AKA Ukasha Nuru v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2005-04-21· cited 461×
- Cole v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2011-09-22· cited 436×
- Jian Guo v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-03-23· cited 362×
- Francisco Ornelas-Chavez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2006-08-21· cited 229×
- Edin Avendano-Hernandez v. Loretta E. LynchNinth Circuit· 2015-09-03· cited 209×
- Moris Quiroz Parada v. Jefferson Sessions, IIINinth Circuit· 2018-08-29· cited 206×
- Delphine Arrey v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-02-26· cited 199×
- Lucero Xochihua-Jaimes v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2020-06-26· cited 194×
- Figueroa v. MukaseyNinth Circuit· 2008-09-10· cited 142×
- Bromfield v. MukaseyNinth Circuit· 2008-09-15· cited 127×
- Felix Flores Rios v. Loretta E. LynchNinth Circuit· 2015-12-01· cited 115×
- Jagtar Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2014-05-21· cited 93×
- Carlos Flores-Lopez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2012-07-09· cited 80×
- John Doe v. Attorney General United StatesThird Circuit· 2020-04-16· cited 52×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.