Ninth Circuit· 5/4/2022
Peter Udo v. Merrick Garland
Citations
- 32 F.4th 1198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A petitioner’s] adverse credibility determination ‘is not necessarily a death knell to CAT protection’ if other evidence in the record alone establishes that he is eligible for CAT relief.” (quoting Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1048–49 (9th Cir. 2010))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court· 1936-02-17· cited 3,147×
- Jamal Ali Farah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2003-11-14· cited 2,889×
- Shrestha v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2010-01-05· cited 1,845×
- Najmabadi v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2010-03-09· cited 1,257×
- Mario Ernesto Navas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2000-06-20· cited 674×
- Carlos Bringas-Rodriguez v. Jefferson SessionsNinth Circuit· 2017-03-08· cited 489×
- Cole v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2011-09-22· cited 436×
- Cecilia Aguilar Fermin v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2020-05-05· cited 248×
- Baghdasaryan v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2010-01-13· cited 220×
- Moris Quiroz Parada v. Jefferson Sessions, IIINinth Circuit· 2018-08-29· cited 206×
- Zhihui Guo v. Jefferson SessionsNinth Circuit· 2018-07-30· cited 190×
- Malak Manes v. Jefferson SessionsNinth Circuit· 2017-11-27· cited 127×
- Antipas Konou v. Eric Holder, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2014-05-09· cited 75×
- Yvette Akosung v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2020-08-14· cited 69×
- Khadka v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2010-08-18· cited 59×
- Danilo Mairena v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-03-07· cited 55×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.