Ysasi v. Rivkind

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that common law or dictionary meaning of term “employer” is inappropriate in the context of a remedial and protective statute
• although Title I’s definition would support the Fund’s argument that the- carriers were employers, that definition was not relevant in light of Title I’s limiting language
• although Title I’s defini- tion would support the Fund’s argument that the carriers were employers, that definition was not relevant in light of Title I’s limiting language
• issue of whether entities were MPPAA employers appropriately resolved in declaratory judgment action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).