Youngman v. Tahmoush

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court must look to all the facts and circumstances in the case, including arguments put forward by the defendant and by way of depositions
• “[P]laintiff . . . must be qualified to serve in a fiduciary capacity as a representative of a class, whose interest is dependent upon the representative’s adequate and fair prosecution.”
• “purely hypothetical, potential or remote conflicts of interests never disable the individual plaintiff”
• “The fact that the plaintiff may have interests which go beyond the interests of the class, but are at least co-extensive with the class interest, will not defeat his serving as a representative of the class” (emphasis added).

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Schick Inc. v. Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers Union
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1987-09-16· cited 90×
• South ex rel. Hecla Mining Co. v. Baker
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2012-09-25· cited 86×
• In Re Fuqua Industries, Inc. Shareholder Litigation
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1999-12-02· cited 27×
• Emerald Partners v. Berlin
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1989-06-30· cited 22×
• In Re Best Lock Corp. Shareholder Litigation
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2001-10-29· cited 21×
• In Re Maxxam, Inc./fed. Dev. Shareholders
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1996-09-10· cited 16×
• Epstein v. MCA, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-10-22· cited 14×
• In re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Delaware Derivative Litigation
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2017-07-25· cited 7×
• Metcoff v. Lebovics
  Connecticut Superior Court· 2007-08-16· cited 6×
• Palmer v. U.S. Savings Bank of America
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1989-02-06· cited 6×
• Ault v. Soutter
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-05-16· cited 5×
• Parsch v. Massey
  Charlottesville County Circuit Court· 2006-10-04· cited 4×
• Newell Co. v. Vermont American Corp.
  N.D. Illinois· 1989-10-13· cited 3×
• Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. UAL Corp.
  N.D. Illinois· 1989-06-30· cited 3×
• Blank v. Belzberg
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2003-06-18· cited 1×
• In re the Arbitration between Hakimian & Bear Stearns & Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-12-06· cited 1×
• Mizel v. Feinberg
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-05-07· cited 1×
• Aztec Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Fisher
  S.D. Texas· 2016-01-21· cited 1×
• Scott v. Lackey
  North Carolina Business Court· 2012-12-03· cited 1×
• Smollar v. Potarazu
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2016-06-29

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• duPont v. Wyly
  D. Delaware· 1973-12-28· cited 90×
• Catherine Wilson Nolen, on Behalf of Herself and All Other Stockholders of the Shaw-Walker Company v. The Shaw-Walker Company
  Sixth Circuit· 1971-10-12· cited 43×
• Roussel v. Tidelands Capital Corp.
  N.D. Alabama· 1977-07-29· cited 26×
• Schnorbach v. Fuqua
  S.D. Georgia· 1975-10-07· cited 20×
• Globus, Inc. v. Jaroff
  S.D. New York· 1967-03-16· cited 19×
• Owen v. Modern Diversified Industries, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1981-03-11· cited 17×
• Tyco Laboratories, Inc. v. Kimball
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1977-10-12· cited 15×
• Robinson v. Computer Servicenters, Inc.
  N.D. Alabama· 1976-12-30· cited 15×